Rick Picks Me Up When I’m Feeling Blue (How ‘Bout You?)
Posted: March 14, 2012 Filed under: Media, Mitt Romney, Santorum 2 Comments »Last night, as nearly everyone is dutifully pointing out, doesn’t change anything in terms of actual delegate accumulation. Absent all the polls the past few days that indicated Romney might win Mississippi, his close third-place finishes might have even been deemed a big breakthrough three weeks ago. Such are the le Carré-like twists and counter-twists of the “expectations game.”
But because, impatience and/or exhaustion notwithstanding, the moment when Romney locks in as the candidate remains a sobering doorway to mind-numbing boredom, Santorum’s double-win in Mississippi and Alabama has opened up just enough daylight for the usual morning-after scramble. Sullivan’s got some of it here (and no one scrambles more energetically than Sullivan), while Noam Scheiber tentatively keeps the dream alive. I’ll continue to assume Romney will win Illinois next week—it’s exactly the kind of situation where he always wins. Maybe the good news out of last night is that he’ll again have to eat through many more millions doing so than he ever would have guessed necessary when this thing began.
By Request
Posted: March 11, 2012 Filed under: Mitt Romney 2 Comments »“How d’ya all feel?! You know, when you’re down in the dumps and you need something to bring you up, there’s only one thing that’s going to do it the way you want it—what’s that???”
“An aggressive pro-growth agenda!”
“I can’t hear you…”
“AN AGGRESSIVE PRO-GROWTH AGENDA!!!”
“Well, alright!”

Plan 999 from Outer Space
Posted: March 8, 2012 Filed under: Newt Newt, Ron Paul, Santorum 4 Comments »On it goes.
Dave Wiegel or someone made a good point yesterday: that after a period where the objective of the media is to prop up the notion that there’s a race, eventually a point is reached where impatience sets in with candidates who hang around for no discernible reason. Blatantly no reason, that is—you could reasonably argue that no one except Romney had any business running in the first place.
That point seems to have arrived. From Sullivan starting a series of Gingrich-related posts entitled “Get. Out. Now.” to a couple of pieces I’ve seen that express more puzzlement than usual as to what exactly Ron Paul’s after, impatience is creeping in. A part of that—with me, I know, and I imagine with others too—is simple exhaustion from months of false Romney-implosion alarms. Anyway, here’s my own assessment of the various reasons why the other three won’t quit. I realize some of this is obvious.
1) A belief that you can still win. Santorum, probably—I get the feeling he’s holding out some measure of hope that if he can get to the convention with Romney short of the required delegates, there’s still a small opening for him. Gingrich, I think (no matter that he says otherwise), has finally moved past denial, and obviously Paul (no matter that he jokingly says otherwise) always knew he had no chance.
2) Angling for 2016 (or, please no, 2020). Santorum, yes; Paul, no; Gingrich only if he’s as crazy as everyone thinks he is. Romney will be one more next-in-line Republican nominee, so that pattern is a big incentive for Santorum to play for second place. Truthfully, though, I don’t think 2016 (much less 2020) will be a next-in-line year. I cannot see Santorum as anything but a bad echo once Rubio and Christie and the rest finally announce.
3) A desire to shape party direction. Paul, definitely, Santorum almost as definitely, Gingrich…is out there in the astral plane, so who knows.
4) Angling for a job if Romney wins. I don’t think any of them are in it for a job. And I think Romney, if he were to win, would be smart enough to pretend to not even remember who these people are the day after he’s inaugurated.
5) Hoping to cash in by other means. Gingrich, of course; whatever it was that he was doing for the past decade, he’ll go back to doing it for twice as much money and armed with ten times as much proof of his world-historical importance. I don’t think Santorum or Paul has hit the lecture and book-tour circuit yet, although that’s probably the last stop for every losing politician eventually.
6) Trying to do whatever you can to muck things up for Romney. I thought (and was hoping) that Newt was going to be a one-man Pretty Hate-Mitt Machine after Florida, but that never really panned out. He still gets his digs in, but being such a slimy character himself, I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s secretly Romney’s biggest fan by now. Santorum, though, does seem to be developing a genuine antipathy for Mitt, so maybe that’s part of his motivation, even though he’ll of course pretend otherwise when the time comes. Paul spends a lot of time chuckling like an insane man, so it’s hard to tell—he doesn’t seem to have any use for anyone, although supposedly he’s part of a secret alliance with Romney.
7) Sundry other reasons. Things like Paul clearing a path for his son Randolph, or Gingrich knowing he’ll never again be so in-demand for the Sunday morning shows. Fred Thompson went from losing in 2008 to tremendous success as a spokesperson for reverse mortgages, so you never know what kind of doors will be opened up once you’ve run for your party’s nomination.
Okay—now that all of that’s settled, the next thing to do is to try to figure out why I haven’t bailed on this four-ring circus. That one requires a little more thought.

It’s Funny Because It’s True
Posted: March 5, 2012 Filed under: Media Leave a comment »Fantastic! I could quibble a bit…1) No acknowledgement of Gingrich or Paul. (In other words, I’m far from convinced that Santorum is once and for all the last non-Romney standing.) Maybe Santorum and Newt could both be poking their heads out of the doghouse, while a tiny bird with a Ron Paul head flies overhead; 2) The cartoon Mitt looks confident and at ease, with everything under control. Obviously, not an accurate representation of the way things have gone thus far (and may yet continue to go). But there’s a lot to be said for simplicity, and this is almost as sublime as 2008′s Barack-and-Michelle-as-secret-Black-Panthers cover.

Lull
Posted: March 4, 2012 Filed under: Mitt Romney, Obama 1 Comment »Your weariness is my weariness. I am you as you are me as Mitt is us and we are all Newt Gingrich. See how they run, like Rick Santorum, see how they fly. I’m crying.
It’s silly to get worked up about Romney’s imminent demise anymore, so even when Santorum was way up in Michigan with a week to go, it felt hollow. And again, like in Florida, so much advance voting had already taken place, Michigan was probably already more or less won weeks ago. Romney says stupid things like every single day (with Kid Rock on board, I feel hip-hop parlance is now the way to go with Romney), but it doesn’t really matter in terms of the nomination, because Santorum’s a veritable saying-stupid-things machine. Meanwhile, Gingrich and Paul barely exist at the moment, although Gingrich managed to turn up on all four Sunday shows this morning, and I guess he’ll win Georgia on Tuesday.
I still think it’ll be a close election. No matter how much goes wrong on the Republican side, Obama’s approval rating continues to stay around 45% on Gallup. (Higher today, as it sometimes is, then it goes down again.) For many months you’d hear that that didn’t matter, because Clinton (in ’96) and Reagan (’84) and Nixon (’72) also had approval ratings in the 40s a year out, and they all won big. But it’s not a year out anymore. If you look at Gallup’s comparative graph, Clinton was at 53% right now, Reagan at 54%, and Nixon at 56%—they were already in the clear. And it still feels to me like Obama’s current good fortune is about as sturdy as a house of cards. Romney’s awful right now; I assume he’ll get better. (That one’s iffy.) The economy is improving, but one bad month and you know there’ll be a pile-on. Gas prices have a life of their own. The myriad problems on the other side of the world are not going away—they never do. I feel much better about Obama’s chances today than I did a year ago, but the idea—expressed by some on the message board, both happily and with disgust—that it’s over strikes me as crazy.

Breitbart
Posted: March 1, 2012 Filed under: Media, Obits 1 Comment »As I may have mentioned earlier, I probably get 50-60% of my current politics intake through podcasts, most of which I download through iTunes (some of which aren’t “podcasts” per se, but radio or TV shows re-formatted as podcasts). Some of the podcasts I download are weekly standbys, which I never miss: Slate‘s “Political Gabfest,” NPR’s “It’s All Politics,” KCRW’s “Left, Right, and Center,” “Real Time with Bill Maher,” and Gwen Ifill’s “Washington Week.” Otherwise, I do topical searches (“Occupy Wall Street,” “Bain Capital,” “Romney Cadillacs,” “Rick Perry Debates,” etc.) or name searches. In regards to the latter — and for reasons I should go into sometime — I almost always look for conservative-identified people, and almost never left wing-identified people (a reversal of my own politics): Laura Ingraham, Imus, Don Wade & Roma, Andrew Breitbart. (Hannity and Rush don’t show up much in iTunes, but I’ve recently found both their shows on a far-reaching AM station out of Buffalo, and I tune in when it’s convenient.) I know people say this all the time upon hearing of someone’s death, but this morning, seeing the flash on my Twitter feed, I was certain that “R.I.P. Andrew Breitbart” was an internet hoax; if any current player in U.S. politics/media would seem privy to such a hoax, it would be him. Indeed, you could almost imagine him perpetrating such a prank.
I will never understand people on the left, many of my Facebook (and in some cases, actual) friends included, who would prefer to rid the world of people they disagree with rather than tune in to those people to hear what they have to say (and how they say it; conservatives, in general, are much more interesting to listen to than liberals — sorry, but it’s true) (liberals, however, are, in general, much better writers — or anyway, much better bloggers). I loved listening to Breitbart. The guy came across as everything his enemies claimed, and worse, and at his best, he was riveting. Pretty sure he’s already been called “the Abbie Hoffman of the right,” and I think that’s right; he was a shit disturber and a blowhard, and he was clearly having the time of his life being those things. He was also, intriguingly enough (given that most conservative media types tend not to delve into matters of, um, culture) an unabashed college rocker. Every so often, on Twitter, Breitbart would tweet about music he was listening to, and it was almost always 80s indie and alternative and new romantic MTV-type of stuff. I laughed once when he enthused about some English Beat song or other (“Save it for Later,” I think it was). I don’t know why; it just seemed really funny, and endearing.
My Weariness Amazes Me
Posted: February 29, 2012 Filed under: Primaries Leave a comment »Wish I had more to say about last night, but I’m kind of at a loss here. I was hopeful for a while that Santorum was going to muck things up bad for Mitt in Michigan (even a tiny win for Rick — delegates or votes — might’ve felt seismic under the circumstances), but it now just seems more likely that the only person he damaged in a week of dispiriting soundbites is himself. His concession speech was emblematic in a way of how the night felt: dreary in tone, laughable in its substance (a “high school history lesson,” said Jackie, charitably), thrice as long as was necessary. I gave Romney about two minutes of air time and bolted. For strategic reasons, I’m not in any hurry to get to the general — the longer these people beat one another up, the better; and yes, I’m all about a brokered convention, who isn’t? — but I’m surprised to find myself actually a little bored at this point.
Set me straight, Phil — what am I missing?
And It Was Alright
Posted: February 24, 2012 Filed under: Mitt Romney 2 Comments »Annie said when she was sixty-two years old
You know my husband’s gonna be the death of us all
Two TV sets and two Cadillac cars
Well, you know it ain’t gonna help me at all
When They’re Applauding, Terminate All Primary and Secondary Functions Immediately
Posted: February 23, 2012 Filed under: Mitt Romney, Santorum Leave a comment »Glad you were able to see the debate. New party slogan: “We’re more fun than sanding floors.”
As weird as it was rooting for Gingrich, it’s even weirder now that I find myself rooting for Santorum. Pretty much everything I’ve heard or read about last night gave the debate to Romney, either by a little or a lot. Didn’t feel that way to me—Romney gets creepier by the day, and that’s a surprise, because you wouldn’t think anybody named Willard could be creepy. That linkage he made between Santorum’s Arlen Specter endorsement and passage of HCR was ridiculous, and I thought Santorum batted it down very well. (Specter was on CNN tonight saying he never made any kind of an agreement over Supreme Court nominations with Santorum; if Santorum was just making stuff up, that could be inconvenient.) Romney taking Santorum’s 2008 endorsement of him and throwing it back in Santorum’s face—like the endorsement meant anything beyond “you’re not as odious to me as McCain”—was equally slimy. Santorum was roundly booed by Romney’s paid-for audience over the earmark detour (which I found fascinating), but I give him credit for holding to the idea that government’s actually supposed to, you know, do stuff. And that last answer of Romney’s, where he ignored the softball question (“What is the biggest misperception about you?”) and instead launched into vision-thing gibberish, was pathetic—it was a question that actually could’ve helped rehabilitate him some.
I’ve long given up trying to figure out the thought processes of these people who are causing the polls to fluctuate 5% every other day. (“Well, it’s true that last week I was for Gingrich, but as of today I’m supporting that new toaster oven as our nominee.”) So I don’t know—maybe Romney did in fact do whatever it was that he was supposed to do. The only good thing I got out of it all was that I’m finally starting to move past feelings of indifference over Romney towards a genuine (perhaps even “robust”) antipathy.

All the Words Float in Sequence
Posted: February 23, 2012 Filed under: CNN, Debates Leave a comment »Last night’s frolic in the desert might be the first Republican debate I want to watch all over again, though with one important provision: the TV sound would need to be turned down and replaced by Another Green World (or, in a pinch, Kid A). Never mind the content, this was an event characterized by weird body language, loopy camera angles, and loony sound bites. There was Romney with his utterly sarcastic clapping routine directed at Santorum (regarding what exactly, I don’t recall — part of the irrelevant earmarks discussion, I think). There was Paul’s unflinching “because he’s a fake!” remark, surely a first in Presidential debates (just try to imagine the contortions Romney would’ve put himself through over a similar defend-your-attack-ad sort of question). Romney got a good shot in at Santorum as well with his quizzical, “I didn’t follow most of that” line, following a bizarrely incoherent spiel about something-or-other. Santorum himself, with a wink aimed squarely at Matt Drudge, managed to invoke his sweet Satan, creating YouTube mashup possibilities almost too terrifying to comprehend. And of course there was Newt, fresh out of yoga class, in constant near-recline in his seat, looking less like a participant than like someone observing the event from afar (personifying, to quote Christgau, “oneness with nature under conditions of artificial gravity” — don’t worry, I’m confused too). Even in his saucier moments — like when he admonished the elite media for not asking Obama why he eats little babies for breakfast — Gingrich seemed fairly mild-mannered, like he really wasn’t too fussed about anything at this point.
One embarrassing CNN moment: John King asking the candidates to describe themselves in one word — then giving them three minutes of commercial break time to prepare!
It’s hard for me to see how any of this stuff really matters too much in the end. No one was badly injured, no one ran away with a gold medal. I suppose Santorum took a half-step back (he was effectively reigned in on the insider-politics stuff) and Romney took a half-step forward (by failing to produce any notable gaffes), but it doesn’t feel, to me anyway, that this race is in an altogether different place today than it was yesterday. But for visual and soundbite election year ambience — good stuff.
Know Hope
Posted: February 21, 2012 Filed under: Media, Newt Newt 2 Comments »Um, a real update at some point, promise. (Too busy lately to try and make sense of the Santorum surge, Romney’s L’Trimm remix, everything else.)
Change of Plans
Posted: February 18, 2012 Filed under: Media Leave a comment »“Something tells me that if the upcoming election could be decided on social issues, the Republicans could win that in a landslide, because we are on the right side of the culture war,” Limbaugh told listeners on Thursday. “The problem is, we’re scared to death of it. The Republican establishment wants no part of it.”

One and the Same
Posted: February 16, 2012 Filed under: Mitt Romney Leave a comment »I’ll hold off a day or two on trying to figure out where this baffling Santorum derailment is headed, and instead pay tribute to an inspired creation someone posted on the message board today. It was prompted by the news that everyone except Gingrich had dropped out of the Georgia debate, which in turn segued into something I proposed a few weeks ago here, that Romney’s ideal debate opponent would be himself. Someone requested a suitable Photoshop of such a showdown, and “Z S,” a guy who’s very good with gifs and photo manipulation, came up with the image below—which immediately reminded me of a TV detective who once famously had to confront his other self in circumstances more or less as strange and disturbing as those in which Romney presently finds himself mired. It’s the red backdrop that really brings the allusion home.

Hail the Conquering Hero
Posted: February 11, 2012 Filed under: Sarah 2 Comments »I don’t know if you’re around a computer today, Scott—I’ve got a film to go to this afternoon—but at 4:30 Palin gives the keynote at CPAC, and you can watch it here. (I had to register first; Holden Caulfield has just been added to Mitt Romney’s mailing list.) It’s her birthday, too, so the Bacardi will be flowing freely.

I’m Spartacus!
Posted: February 9, 2012 Filed under: Herman Cain, Mitt Romney 3 Comments »CPAC is underway, and on day one there’s already big news. Somewhere, Mitt Romney is making that “My God, what have I done?” face he would make at the debates every time Rick Perry spoke. It all brings to mind my favourite McCain moment of the 2008 campaign:



Comments